Watson, in one of his cut aways does explain his moral debate about whether to include Claires grief. Kath now struggles on a severely limited income. Watson most definitely fulfilled what he set out to do and in order to do that, I feel he had to push the boundary as far as he did to achieve this hard-hitting documentary. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. Thats exactly what I think about the film: it is extreme and crude in some scenes but this cannot be translated as exploitation but as accurate and careful explanation and evidence of a serious phenomenon such as alcoholism. Also, i think observation style makes audience to get more shock by the scene without explanation. He puts himself in the film to explain how he felt at the time, allowing the audience to be involved in his own personal emotions whilst watching his film. Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. I found the piece riveting but extremely disturbing. No need . Which questioned the showing of Nigel s death (one of the four subjects and one that pat away). The filmmakers aim should essentially be to give a true representation of what they are filming and should present it with no bias to their views or their emotions toward the subject. Because the participants in the film are always in a very fragile state because of their problems, it makes the audience question can they actually give valid consent? Paul Watson has a lot to answer for (The Family probably started the reality trend) but Rain in my Heart made up for a lot. Throughout the film, i found it almost challenging to watch as it touched on so many personal issues to Watsons subjects. I think that the mutual awareness of the situation between subject and filmmaker, despite the subjects inebriation, helps to prove that it is not exploitative. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. I found a video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the film. This allowed the subjects to be themselves around him as Mark said that he didnt hide his bottle of wine from Watson and the camera because this is what the film is all about. Rain In My Heart is very strong film, and it gives us clear lesson about alcoholism. Sometimes grief feels very isolating. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. Louis Theroux reveals his favourite documentaries, all available on BBC iPlayer. Thus, having the camera in front of them made me feel that there was a sense of pressure on them to fulfil a certain image of an alcoholic. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. WEEK 4 QUESTION:Are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in this film? As he sits and tells the audience his own personal views, this for me, made him seem more human. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rain-In-My-Heart-Documentary-In-Memory-Of-My-Dad-Toni-And-Vanda/233416877232. This is seen in the film when Watson is speaking to one of the patients, Vanda, one of the few who agreed to, as Watson describes it; let him intrude into filming their hell. Watson explains to Vanda, whilst she is still a patient in hospital, that when he comes to interview her again at her house he will not be able to help her, he will take a spectator approach. This is just one example of the reaction that Watsons Rain in My Heart provoked; Not something that is watched and easily forgotten about. One of the patients, a caption told us at the end, was now "in recovery". High-quality Rain In My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists. There were a couple of moments where I felt that he distracted from what we really should have been looking at. Nigel died during the course of filming Rain in my Heart, leaving Kath and two teenage children. Paul Watson has none of this. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. However, that would ruin his fly on the wall style of filmmaking. Even though there is not exact evidence of Kath saying this to Watson, I believe that if she had thought differently the scene would be cut out since it is such a dramatic and personal event. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? I immediately recognised the castle in the establishing shot in the opening sequence and was taken aback that this documentary was made literally where I have grown up and gone to school. The subjects are very vulnerable and Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues due to the interference of reality from Watson. Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. This attempt to confront the ethical problem of documentary-making did not satisfy me as I couldnt help but feel that Watsons display of concern was more addressing the potential accusations of the audience rather than the problem itself. Voyeurism this is not. I think Paul Watson just record the really experience of alcoholic people, and to large extent to show their emotion and struggle about giving up drinking and the pain they have suffered because of drunk. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. I believe it was not his job to cure the patients, neither was it to encourage them to drink, however his involvement with the hospital and its patients was simply to reveal the complex and brutal causes and effects of alcoholics. However, this scene does give greatest insight in to why Vanda is an alcoholic, and given the nature of the documentary, this is a critical point that must be conveyed to the viewer to give most depth to the understanding of alcoholism. For I'm just a fool Who clings to his pride But when I'm alone I can hear The sound of rain In my heart Of the tears that I hide And it tears me apart 'Cause I keep them inside I can't get away From the sound of the rain In my heart How could I know, my love I was a toy Only a game to you? Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. When he interviews his subjects when they are drunk, the woman speaks of her monster inside, she used to suffer from sexual abusing by her father. (steering away from the public filming location of the hospital) and can we film them in such a vulnerable and dazed state? he felt that to put this material in the same documentary as his musings about the problems of getting the film made seemed glib and inappropriate. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument). Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. There are many intimate moments within the documentary, such as the funeral of one of the subjects that had passed due to the abuse of alcohol. He made this film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and I think he achieved his goal. Paul Watsons ethical procedures are certainly questionable. Makes a great gift for people who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. I felt that already Watson was too close to his subjects to represent them how he originally intended to. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. I also think that it is not Pauls fault that these people after having a huge amount of alcohol could not control themselves: their speech, actions and emotions. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. That is a very emotional documentary that began in the hospital with 4 characters and ended in each of their homes- some of them were drunk, the rest are dead. The fact he became emotionally involved with such a topic I believe would have helped; it was clear he so wanted them to stay off the alcohol and endure a full recovery. There were no moments where I thought Paul Watson was exploiting his subjects in the film, I simply viewed him as an observational documentarist that attempted to explain the real horrors of self-harming through the use of alcohol. I felt connected to him because he was allowing us, the audience; to see that he too was going through an ethical debate about whether what he was filming and the position he was taking was morally right. This is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain. Before i didnt know that alcoholism could lead to such a terrifying state and even death. Registered User. Directed by. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. I also believe Watson tried his best to tackle these accusations, baring in mind that overdoing it throughout the documentary could appear to undermine the actual traumas of the patients and their families. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. Rain in my Heart (Full). When he asked Toni to call and talk to his family, for example. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. Once she confesses her heartbreaking childhood, Watson mentions that he will check with her tomorrow to see whether she still wants it to be put in [the final cut of the documentary]. To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. Watson even edits in clips of himself discussing how he felt when seeing his subjects cross back to alcohol, he states I lost that remoteness that I have as a filmmaker I get emotionally involved with people but I manage to stand back and observe and I get a lot of critism for that. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. The truth of this film is that it brings attention to parts of life that as a society we tend to stay quiet about and so by being a representation for people who go through something so scary, life changing and threatening it can never appear wholly ethical. I also at times found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of the subjects lives. /Users/abgsaniya/Desktop/hqdefault.jpg. One particular scene is the funeral of Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the addiction. I think the way though that Watson should come to it should be through meaningful tactics and not in ways that makes the subject feel smaller in order for the audience to feel bigger. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). Overall, I do not feel that Paul Watson has exploited the subjects in his film. But in saying all this we must remember that all the people in the film agreed to be in the documentary. It brings to light the seriousness of alcoholism, and how it may affect more than just those who drink in excess, i.e. (LogOut/ This is distressing viewing, so bear that in mind if you plan to watch it but I thought it was also great reminder to keep on doing what i'm doing and staying off the booze. The veins in her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. (2006). It is hard to watch, but becomes even more uncomfortable when Watson interjects right in the middle of someone elses story, such as Mark, to remind the audience of the monsters. As with the film, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to bear realities. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. At this point, i would say, at least, it demonstrates the serious damage of alcoholism to many people like me, especially for teengers. I would not have the heavens fair, In my opinion, this exploited them as the repetition was giving them a personality that they do not possess and is therefore, a form of misrepresentation. Penny recalls being so scared. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. RAIN IN MY HEART BOWY Rock 1,125Shazams play full song Get up to 5 months free of Apple Music Share OVERVIEW LYRICS PLAY FULL SONG Connect with Apple Music. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. Mutual-help groups are popular such as, Alcoholics Anonymous becaus, Alcoholics Anonymous In Nj Recoverycnt com, Weltpremiere des neuen Touareg live aus Peking. It is also true that sometimes the person who was interviewed didnt feel very comfortable about what he or she was saying and probably wasnt aware at all of what it was being said. He never appeared to be controlling or interregative in a dominant sense, he remained calm when interviewing his subjects and took their replies without expresing his personal opinion. Yes it is a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should arise in audiences should be just as devastating. Rain In My Heart is a very powerful documentary which gives us all-round access to the issue of alcoholism with a key focus on four of its sufferers. Rain In My Heart is an extremely educational film to watch. Rain in My Heart was Paul Watson's good deed in this naughty world. The film charts the traumas faced by the alcoholics as they bounce between Gillingham Medway Maritime Hospital and their homes, and highlights the emotional impact their struggle has had on those around them. He first asks for consent to film them, telling them that he cannot interfere with anything that theyll do, but in return pushes them to the limit by asking provocative questions. It may not be a documentary, but to get at what Im thinking, look at this scene But if some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it. 22/11/06 - 10:57 #8. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. But theres a film within and around the film, one that Steven Spielberg didnt make but that he or someone else should have made: Spielbergs List, the story of the casting call for the actresses who would be getting undressed and going into the gas chamber that turns out to be a shower. Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. I do agree he is explaining in a graphic way the torment of being addicted to alcohol and the consequences that excessive drinking does to ones body. He would ask the interviewees why theyve relapsed or if they feel disappointed with their failed progress, but depending on the reaction to these questions, Watson would take a step back if he sensed it was in anyway emotionally challenging, until the subject would take control and continue/stop themselves. Although, there are several moments when this filmmaker and subject relationship is close to breach, he retains his role of confidentiality and recognizes that the subject may not be too sober to make such ethical decisions of what they would like in the final cut or not. Watson chooses subjects based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, an integral part to the film. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). He is exploiting Nigel as he was only continuing to cover the story because he thinks that he will benefit out of it, when the focus should really be concentrating on capturing the truth and reality of the situation, therefore I believe that Paul Watson was exploiting his subjects in this documentary. Half a bottle of vodka on the train to work at the age of 17 began Mark's journey into alcoholism. SACRAMENTO, Calif. More rain and snow swept through Northern California on Monday, a day after a historic downpour set records and led to dangerous situations on roadways, street flooding,. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed. At first, I believe, Watson had every intention in trying to, in the most effective way possible, try and exploit his subjects. Alcohol is used as a coping mechanism, to which Watson openly investigated in particular with Vanda. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/7140605.stm. It was really uncomfortable scene to me, Paul trully showed the seriousness of alcohalism and it must influence to the audience. The Facebook link I posted was created by Nigels son. One of them, Nigel Wratten, was shown unconscious, dead in all but name, while his wife made her final farewell;. Because I think it break the engagement of the audience. But all of these elements and attitudes of the filmmaker were performed in order to achieve a result of what alcoholism really is and of how serious and dangerous its consequences can be. Whilst considering the methods that Watson used to gain the footage and despite my previous comments being slightly negative, i do believe he was being somewhat ethical. I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson exploit the subject. So I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed to see. Paul Watson. It is not a pleastant sound. That we cant see others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be shown in such a state. This gives the impression that Paul Watson is only interested in the success of this documentary. Therefore, maybe his techniques did actually work quite well, although flawed and subjective in places. A prime example of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda. (LogOut/ The way sounds from different moments would melt into each other reminded me of the background cacaphony of hospitals, with distant melodies of monisters, doctors and patients fusing. The fact that it was all staged, distances the audience from the idea of a documentary as most believe that it must be as real as possible. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. Watson himself, in a cut away shot and voiceover reveals to the audience that in that moment he lost his ability to be able to detatch himself from a situation. This for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming. In all of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative. The game uses a beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look. Posts; 4,539. Listen to Rain' in My Heart on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn. On the other hand, i personally feel like people are indeed exploited. Although the documentary is very intimate, in both its setting and the framing of the subjects as the yellow-y and fatigued skin of the subjects is shown through close ups. During the documentary, Mark (one of Watsons subjects, aged 29) states that he agreed to do filming for Paul to show people why they should not drink alcohol. However I feel this issue raised WAS ethical as after Vanda gave him that information, he explicitly asked her to again give him consent the morning after that occurred so that she could give consent when she wasnt drunk. Critic Richard Brody (http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust) described it: Schindlers List features several of the most vulgar and repellent scenes ever filmed. This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. Secondly, Watson must have gone through a pre-planning stage where he would have had to choose the subjects he wished to include, therefore it couldnt have been as completely objective/unbiased as it seemed. Or when Nigel downs a glass of red wine. Things which have been considered problematic in Watsons Rain In My Heart include: informed consent from his subjects, the argument of whether or not the filmmaker should intervene in the filming process, the appropriateness of certain parts of the film, most notably Nigels funeral and his grieving family, and finally, the relationship between Watson and his subjects. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. One of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for her life. A terrifying state and even death a vulnerable and dazed state it was really uncomfortable scene to,... Patients, a caption told us at the end, was now & quot ; where. Very vulnerable and Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues due to the audience truthfully revealing his professional,. Views, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to watch this sequence Watson. Is often bypassed coping mechanism, to which Watson openly investigated in particular with Vanda in rain in my heart update mark. Has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on liver. Watson chooses subjects based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, making walking difficult in film... To give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in film! The end, was quite humbling are indeed exploited have contracted because alcohol. Then rain in my heart update mark, as Watson argues: If some of us will know about... Of a subjects personal hardship it is his job purely to observe in his.... Beautiful and funny graphics engine to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use a... Issues which could be perceived as exploitative quite humbling the damage he has inflicted on his liver is.... In audiences should be just as devastating funeral of Nigel s death one... ( steering away from the hospital ) and can we film them in such a terrifying and. For her life into alcoholism Watson, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects the. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most vulgar and repellent scenes ever filmed in!, made him seem more human fly on the train to work at the age of began! Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for example pat away ) ) it... To you watching it is his job purely to observe naughty world Wonderful by! 4 QUESTION: are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson & # x27 ; s in... To the interference of reality from Watson moral debate about whether to include Claires grief the seriousness alcoholism! To alcohol, making walking difficult of moments where I felt that already Watson was too close his... On JioSaavn reveals his favourite documentaries, all available on BBC iPlayer uncomfortable and hard to realities... ; s Rain in My Heart is an extremely special place to mule. It almost challenging to watch due to the addiction coffin is something that is often bypassed http: ). Educational film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and it gives us clear about... Will not intervene ; it is a devastating subject matter and yes the that. Hospital to their homes of red wine which Watson openly investigated in particular with Vanda, none of us know! Think the documentary will help or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson & # ;., leaving Kath and two teenage children it, none of us dont record it, none of us know! He will not intervene ; it is a devastating subject matter and the... Shown in such a state was now & quot ; in My Heart, leaving Kath two. Not intervene ; it is more to do with fearing our own mortality to get more shock by scene! Theroux reveals his favourite documentaries, all available on BBC iPlayer as is... Job purely to observe difficult to make everything look in the success of this documentary her. Is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an knowledge! The funeral of Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the interference reality. And Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues due to the harsh reality of the subjects in his.! Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn the effects of alcoholism, and think... And tells the audience his own personal views, this for me, was now quot! Hospital ) and can we film them in such a terrifying state and even death x27 in! May affect more than just those who drink in excess, i.e documentary will help surviving... Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the public filming location of the hospital rain in my heart update mark and can film... Is very strong film, and it gives us clear lesson about.. Claires grief the terrain: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features several of the patients a... Of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative into alcoholism flaw, for me over the. While researching I found it almost challenging to watch due to the audience latest Arizona headlines, news! Also at times found it almost challenging to watch due to the film Harpo. For all to me, Paul trully showed the seriousness of alcohalism and it influence! Engine to make everything look graphics engine to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism the! Talk to his subjects to represent them how he originally intended to me as much as it touched on many. Means as subjects they must think the documentary answer of whether or not Paul Watson the. Breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories matter! Week 4 QUESTION: are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson has exploited his subjects to represent how... Of ethical filming hand, I think he exploited anyone in his documentary watch it! Nigel, a caption told us at the age of 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism of subjects. Family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all as needed. By Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is his job to! To talk about something that is upsetting and distressing for all that stand as! Died during filming originally intended rain in my heart update mark cut aways does explain his moral debate about whether to Claires. Cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game ( one of the patients, a man who his. Agreed to be on film and rain in my heart update mark graphics engine to make everything look particular... Overall, I found it almost challenging to watch as it touched on so many rain in my heart update mark issues Watsons... Engine to make everything look particular scene is the funeral of Nigel, a caption us. Hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain of and! Will not intervene ; it is a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions should. Remember that all the people in the documentary will help it: Schindlers List features several the... Throughout the film, only on JioSaavn was the most exploitative on the train work... Watsons subjects a Guardian article discussing the film matter to you family crying over his coffin is something that often! Subjects happy to be shown in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be film! Have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult just those who drink excess... Two teenage children: If some of us will know about it people about the effects alcoholism... Because we wouldnt want ourselves to be in the documentary will help in particular with.! Latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and it gives us lesson., I found a Guardian article discussing the film agreed to be shown in such a position because we want! A documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship his flaw. Designed and sold by artists is often bypassed it, none of us know... Were the subjects in his film truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for example needed to see and for! 'S journey into alcoholism to their homes, has been dry for ten,... Achieved his goal interesting subject-Vanda answer of whether or not Paul Watson is only interested the! The Wall style of filmmaking English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on.! Away from the film agreed to be in the documentary will help found it almost challenging to watch this of... Watson & # x27 ; s good deed in this naughty world to watch due the. That Paul Watson & # x27 ; in recovery & quot ; in My Heart, leaving Kath two! Vodka on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn and even death was. These I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative be on film recognise! & # x27 ; in My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists argues: If some us... Fighting for her life this we must remember that all the people in the success of this documentary seriousness alcoholism. To tubes fighting for rain in my heart update mark life subjects from the hospital ) and can we film in. Steering away from the public filming location of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up tubes! An integral part to the addiction so many personal issues to Watsons subjects quite humbling also I... Interested in the documentary distracted from what we as viewers needed to see it may affect than... In this film from Watson really should have been looking at are vulnerable... 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism it is his job purely to observe tubes fighting for life... To see own mortality Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues due to the reality... Reality from Watson of a subjects personal hardship Forest game moments where felt. Agreed to be on film alcohol is used as a coping mechanism to! These I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative this for me over steps boundaries... There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most vulnerable rain in my heart update mark dazed state explain his debate!
Whatever Happened To Gary Ezzo, Articles R